Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13101 - 13110 of 30115 for de.

[PDF] WI APP 12
interpretation presents a question of law, which is subject to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183046 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record.” Id., ¶39. We review de novo whether summary judgment was appropriate. Id., ¶20. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132014 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Carol M. Oberbreckling v. Waterford Square Apartments
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16339 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de novo whether there was reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572371 - 2022-09-29

[PDF] State v. Rodney Calhoun
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mark Grebner v. Sharon Schiebel
. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2680 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tammy J. Kaufman v. Donald E. Postle
of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2612 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] LaVerne Swanson v. Ronald W. Nelson
the verdict is a question of law we review de novo. See Weiss v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 197 Wis.2d 365, 388
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10954 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Donald L. Mulder v. Economy Preferred Insurance Company
. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is also de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2768 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 25
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94426 - 2014-09-15