Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13101 - 13110 of 18714 for quote.
Search results 13101 - 13110 of 18714 for quote.
COURT OF APPEALS
that it “base[d] its case ‘entirely on a theory of proximity.’” (Quoting Thurman’s brief.) Instead, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
that it “base[d] its case ‘entirely on a theory of proximity.’” (Quoting Thurman’s brief.) Instead, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome’” of the trial. (Quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984).) Jackowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118308 - 2014-07-28
in the outcome’” of the trial. (Quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984).) Jackowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118308 - 2014-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
(quoting State v. Combs, 2006 WI App 137, ¶32, 295 Wis. 2d 457, 720 N.W.2d 684). ¶18 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113104 - 2014-05-27
(quoting State v. Combs, 2006 WI App 137, ¶32, 295 Wis. 2d 457, 720 N.W.2d 684). ¶18 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113104 - 2014-05-27
State v. Nou Yang
. (quoted source omitted). The same is true in this case. While the trial court cited to cases involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5721 - 2005-03-31
. (quoted source omitted). The same is true in this case. While the trial court cited to cases involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William Fifer, Sr. v. Lyle A. Dix
), we interpreted a predecessor of the present WIS. STAT. § 174.02(1), quoted above in footnote 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15704 - 2017-09-21
), we interpreted a predecessor of the present WIS. STAT. § 174.02(1), quoted above in footnote 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 72 Wis. 2d 327, 329, 240 N.W.2d 635 (1976) (quoting § 974.06 and recognizing that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
, 72 Wis. 2d 327, 329, 240 N.W.2d 635 (1976) (quoting § 974.06 and recognizing that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert Johnson
.'” Berry v. State, 87 Wis.2d 85, 88, 273 N.W.2d 376, 378 (Ct. App. 1978) (quoting 4 WILLIAM BLACKSTONE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8487 - 2017-09-19
.'” Berry v. State, 87 Wis.2d 85, 88, 273 N.W.2d 376, 378 (Ct. App. 1978) (quoting 4 WILLIAM BLACKSTONE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8487 - 2017-09-19
Latisha N. Greene v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
Wis.2d 537, 544, 518 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Ct. App. 1994) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11389 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 537, 544, 518 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Ct. App. 1994) (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11389 - 2005-03-31
John P. Pappas v. Angeline Pappas Petros
and quoted sources omitted). ¶25 The circuit court found that the coal bunker underneath the alley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4861 - 2005-03-31
and quoted sources omitted). ¶25 The circuit court found that the coal bunker underneath the alley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4861 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gloria A. v. State
." Christopher D., at 700-01, 530 N.W.2d at 42 (quoting § 809.107(1), STATS.). Because the 180-day time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8590 - 2017-09-19
." Christopher D., at 700-01, 530 N.W.2d at 42 (quoting § 809.107(1), STATS.). Because the 180-day time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8590 - 2017-09-19