Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13111 - 13120 of 51500 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

[PDF] George G. Muth v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
economic damages of $650,000, nuisance damages of $200,000, and costs of $257,289.96, for a total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24671 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
DeGraff appeal orders dismissing their complaint and awarding costs to the respondent defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241021 - 2019-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
of Nieves’s request that the State be found in contempt and ordered to pay costs and attorney fees associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80046 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to consider the merits of Nieves’s request that the State be found in contempt and ordered to pay costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80046 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
a trial court order that denied him $188.98 in costs after he prevailed in his certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15131 - 2017-09-21

Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tracy George appeals from a trial court order that denied him $188.98 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15131 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 56
) determined the amount of attorney fees to be awarded as reasonable costs of collection in a third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218465 - 2018-10-11

Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Department of Health and Family Services
. The interpretation of the methods of implementation, and the effect of judicial decisions on the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3012 - 2005-03-31

2010 WI APP 87
to communicate effectively with them in representing their interests. Alden further acknowledged the drainage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51289 - 2010-07-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the amount of the DOT’s overpayment, $7,540, plus costs, disbursements and pre-judgment interest. Goeman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210103 - 2018-04-18