Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13121 - 13130 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13121 - 13130 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed de novo. See id. at 424. The circuit court’s No. 2015AP443-CRNM 6 determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155859 - 2017-09-21
reviewed de novo. See id. at 424. The circuit court’s No. 2015AP443-CRNM 6 determination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tdurado Jacques Head
we review de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court found that Law did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13574 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court found that Law did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13574 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11 (citations and text omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
a question of law, which we review de novo. Giminski, 247 Wis. 2d 750, ¶11 (citations and text omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
State v. Timothy L. Olson
for a sentence credit. Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14052 - 2005-03-31
for a sentence credit. Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Steven P. Fleming
determination NO. 96-3022 4 de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
determination NO. 96-3022 4 de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Craig T. Bates
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
Angela M. McEvoy v. Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
is a question of law which we review de novo. See United Capitol Ins. Co. v. Bartolotta's Fireworks Co., 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10616 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See United Capitol Ins. Co. v. Bartolotta's Fireworks Co., 200
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
complaint with prejudice. Selgren appeals. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Willie Hampton v. Jose T. Lloren, M.D.
no genuine issues of fact as to his liability. We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11409 - 2017-09-19
no genuine issues of fact as to his liability. We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11409 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Zweiger appeals. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26
. Zweiger appeals. ¶7 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142165 - 2015-05-26