Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

Ramiro Estrada v. State
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31

James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darryl E. Pierce
the defense is a question of law we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶19 We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31

Tammy J. Kaufman v. Donald E. Postle
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2612 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the historical facts to constitutional principles presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ralph C. Haralson
of life. See De Keuster v. Green Bay & W. R.R. Co., 264 Wis. 476, 479, 59 N.W.2d 452, 454 (1953
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8500 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
of a contract is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis. 2d 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4913 - 2017-09-19

State v. Craig T. Bates
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See Moats, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31

Shawn K. Bergsbaken v. Jeffrey D. Burdey
de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 224, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999). However, once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15471 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
can be granted is a question of law that we review de novo. Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109904 - 2014-04-02