Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 58502 for o j.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 58502 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
535 (1974) (“[O]bjects falling within the plain view of an officer who has a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149774 - 2017-09-21
535 (1974) (“[O]bjects falling within the plain view of an officer who has a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Atkinson last summer o[r] the summer before. People [the client] knows as “Reggie” and “Little Jig” were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110342 - 2017-09-21
and Atkinson last summer o[r] the summer before. People [the client] knows as “Reggie” and “Little Jig” were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
by a preponderance of the credible evidence.” Id. “[T]o prove that a search or seizure within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
by a preponderance of the credible evidence.” Id. “[T]o prove that a search or seizure within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alex Nieves
of a “bright orange” jacket. According to Courture, Nieves put the gun “[n]o more than six inches” from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4690 - 2005-03-31
of a “bright orange” jacket. According to Courture, Nieves put the gun “[n]o more than six inches” from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George Taylor
and answers posed during jury No. 98-1030 6 selection is essential to any meaningful review o[f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
and answers posed during jury No. 98-1030 6 selection is essential to any meaningful review o[f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for “ACCESS TO EAGLE LAKE.” ¶17 Finally, we address the Bluemers’ assertion that “[o]nly the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818206 - 2024-06-26
for “ACCESS TO EAGLE LAKE.” ¶17 Finally, we address the Bluemers’ assertion that “[o]nly the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818206 - 2024-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: [O]ne type of manifest injustice is the failure of the trial court to establish a sufficient factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240190 - 2019-05-02
: [O]ne type of manifest injustice is the failure of the trial court to establish a sufficient factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240190 - 2019-05-02
[PDF]
State v. David Guzman
.” The trial court then concluded, [O]n the basis of this record and after having considered the serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15350 - 2017-09-21
.” The trial court then concluded, [O]n the basis of this record and after having considered the serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15350 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert D. Keith
, the trial court ruled that the evidence was probative and relevant. “[O]bjections to the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14920 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court ruled that the evidence was probative and relevant. “[O]bjections to the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14920 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 97
that Robinson had two open warrants, “[o]ne warrant was [for] a family offense, and another warrant was for, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36947 - 2009-07-28
that Robinson had two open warrants, “[o]ne warrant was [for] a family offense, and another warrant was for, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36947 - 2009-07-28