Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 59341 for quit claim deed.
CA Blank Order
merit to this claim. The no-merit report and Alexander’s response address whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106834 - 2014-01-13
merit to this claim. The no-merit report and Alexander’s response address whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106834 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Defender. Any claim for plea withdrawal based on Reid’s alleged comments would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493523 - 2022-03-15
Defender. Any claim for plea withdrawal based on Reid’s alleged comments would lack arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493523 - 2022-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suit, claiming that the Corporate Individuals had breached their fiduciary duties and seeking to void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832654 - 2024-07-31
suit, claiming that the Corporate Individuals had breached their fiduciary duties and seeking to void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832654 - 2024-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which were all signed in early 2009 and were nearly identical, from individuals who claimed they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
, which were all signed in early 2009 and were nearly identical, from individuals who claimed they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
claim; and (7) excluded Abex’s expert testimony. Because we conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76407 - 2012-01-17
claim; and (7) excluded Abex’s expert testimony. Because we conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76407 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Roundtree moved for resentencing, claiming that the lawyer who represented him at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75746 - 2014-09-15
Roundtree moved for resentencing, claiming that the lawyer who represented him at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75746 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the claims against it should have been dismissed for failure to comply with the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29598 - 2007-07-09
the claims against it should have been dismissed for failure to comply with the statute of limitations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29598 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
Anthony v. Lawrence R. LaPorte
or barred by the statute of limitations. For procedural reasons, we do not consider the Chiconases’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10915 - 2017-09-20
or barred by the statute of limitations. For procedural reasons, we do not consider the Chiconases’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10915 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, claiming that the lawyer who represented him at sentencing was constitutionally ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75746 - 2011-12-27
, claiming that the lawyer who represented him at sentencing was constitutionally ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75746 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
was “appoint[ed] … to act on behalf of the state.”[2] He claims that, as a result, the case became a “private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
was “appoint[ed] … to act on behalf of the state.”[2] He claims that, as a result, the case became a “private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03