Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13131 - 13140 of 58492 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
V. Kramer’s home to Burneske but not reserving a life estate for Kramer. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30129 - 2007-08-29

[PDF] Northern Indiana MFabricators, Inc. v. Seville Flexpack Corporation
-0205 2 PER CURIAM. Seville Flexpack Corporation appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11993 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jonathan C. Garcia
was not in the exclusive possession of the prosecution and was known by Garcia at the time of trial, and that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10597 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State of Arizona v. Brian L. Nowak
: (1) whether the trial court had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed on a Uniform Support Petition when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9967 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jose R.
, 43. Our review of a trial court’s determination is two fold: (1) the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ronald E. Dion
battery, and two counts of interfering with the custody of the other parent. Dion challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3593 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert M. H.
considers whether Robert’s trial counsel was ineffective by not objecting to, and by actively eliciting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bryan L. Lopez
the trial court erred by allowing him to represent himself. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4889 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Dawn
and the entry of judgment were delayed until 1989, when the trial court imposed a ten-year sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8855 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John E. Joyce v. Anne E. Whiteagle
rights; (3) the $10,000 sanction was not warranted by the evidence; and (4) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9212 - 2017-09-19