Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13141 - 13150 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 13141 - 13150 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced him to twelve years each of initial confinement and extended supervision to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68247 - 2014-09-15
sentenced him to twelve years each of initial confinement and extended supervision to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68247 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence consisting of six years’ initial confinement and four years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107373 - 2017-09-21
sentence consisting of six years’ initial confinement and four years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and twenty-five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548133 - 2022-07-27
years of initial confinement and twenty-five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548133 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and four years of extended supervision. Before imposing the No. 2014AP2341-CRNM 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137016 - 2017-09-21
and four years of extended supervision. Before imposing the No. 2014AP2341-CRNM 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137016 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. ¶6 In postconviction proceedings, Grant argued that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
of extended supervision. ¶6 In postconviction proceedings, Grant argued that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
State v. James C.M.
with the extension of orders; the trial court did not extend its order, it lifted the stay previously imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
with the extension of orders; the trial court did not extend its order, it lifted the stay previously imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and four years’ extended supervision. The court denied Knaus’ postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
and four years’ extended supervision. The court denied Knaus’ postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37585 - 2009-07-14
State v. Deryl B. Beyer
extended the delay, he argues that the more substantial part was due to the circuit court’s failure in its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1234 - 2005-01-26
extended the delay, he argues that the more substantial part was due to the circuit court’s failure in its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1234 - 2005-01-26
State v. Allan Biesterveld
composed of twelve years of initial confinement and eighteen years of extended supervision. After being
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26272 - 2006-08-22
composed of twelve years of initial confinement and eighteen years of extended supervision. After being
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26272 - 2006-08-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement (IC) and four years’ extended supervision (ES), concurrent with the identical
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17
’ initial confinement (IC) and four years’ extended supervision (ES), concurrent with the identical
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221941 - 2018-10-17