Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13141 - 13150 of 61041 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the Information in order to add the possession charge. We most recently held that his claims were procedurally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329157 - 2021-02-02

[PDF] NOTICE
court concluded that Wheeler’s claims are procedurally barred, and we affirm. No. 2008AP629
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34836 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate proceedings are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36147 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South Carolina law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Stahl
claims the trial court erred in concluding that he had not presented a new sentencing factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21

Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
Andrew S. Zieve appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d at 181. Claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or by prior motion are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04

[PDF] NOTICE
No. 2004AP3348-CR 2 court reasoned that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27314 - 2014-09-15

State v. Randy J. Stahl
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30

COURT OF APPEALS
157 (1994) (postconviction claims that could have been raised in prior postconviction or appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36147 - 2009-04-13