Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13151 - 13160 of 16407 for commentating.

Diane L. Finster v. James R. Finster
and made negative comments about their mother. Phipps-Yonas further testified that Diane should not share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5892 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that it did.’” See id. at 779 (brackets in DeSantis). The neighbor understood the complainant’s comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82155 - 2012-05-07

[PDF] State v. Stanley Lee Felton
. The trial court then incorrectly commented that “it appears that most of the educational portion of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9649 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Betty Sadowsky v. The Anchor Packing Co.
response brief to comment on the transcript citations the appellant made for the first time in her reply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9412 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to this court’s sentencing analysis.” Further, even if the court’s comment about exchanging bullets was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10

State v. Richard L. Verkler
that there was no right to counsel in the implied consent setting, it commented that it was the court’s preference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Susan M. Cotten
that it represented a failure to prosecute the case. ¶11 The circuit court commented that Attorney Cotten's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16597 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of activity.” ¶16 The circuit court continued, “And in reading the [PSI], the comment that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 3 Berlin contends, in a one-sentence argument, that the prosecutor’s comment on M.W.’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133343 - 2017-09-21

State v. Eric Rodriguez
comments do not demonstrate that the trial court was objectively biased against Rodriguez. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14328 - 2005-03-31