Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13151 - 13160 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 13151 - 13160 of 58245 for speedy trial.
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Jens W.L. Hinrichsen
) there was no probable cause to arrest; (2) the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence; (3) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11375 - 2017-09-19
) there was no probable cause to arrest; (2) the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence; (3) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11375 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal that he was unfairly prejudiced by a trial court ruling allowing evidence related to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
on appeal that he was unfairly prejudiced by a trial court ruling allowing evidence related to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
of “attempting to attempt” a crime, which does not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
of “attempting to attempt” a crime, which does not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
Norman L. Zimdars v. Margaret A. VanCleave
are not persuaded that the judgment was ambiguous or improperly construed but conclude the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
are not persuaded that the judgment was ambiguous or improperly construed but conclude the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, the judgment shall be modified to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
, the judgment shall be modified to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31
Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
Huber, the Oneida County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.[2] Johns contends the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31
Huber, the Oneida County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.[2] Johns contends the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31