Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13151 - 13160 of 58250 for speedy trial.
Search results 13151 - 13160 of 58250 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal that he was unfairly prejudiced by a trial court ruling allowing evidence related to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
on appeal that he was unfairly prejudiced by a trial court ruling allowing evidence related to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705876 - 2023-09-27
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
Norman L. Zimdars v. Margaret A. VanCleave
are not persuaded that the judgment was ambiguous or improperly construed but conclude the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
are not persuaded that the judgment was ambiguous or improperly construed but conclude the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31
Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
Huber, the Oneida County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.[2] Johns contends the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31
Huber, the Oneida County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.[2] Johns contends the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kathryn A. Sabella v. Miguel S. Melendez
to No. 99-0870 2 purchase submitted by Sabella and accepted by Melendez.1 In the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15336 - 2017-09-21
to No. 99-0870 2 purchase submitted by Sabella and accepted by Melendez.1 In the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15336 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
occurred. At trial, expert testimony was presented indicating that Caitlyn’s conduct was consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
occurred. At trial, expert testimony was presented indicating that Caitlyn’s conduct was consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5455 - 2017-09-19
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5455 - 2017-09-19