Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 64755 for b's.
State v. Reinaldo C. Acosta
: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19911 - 2005-10-10
: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19911 - 2005-10-10
L.P. Mooradian Company v. Mednikow Properties, Inc.
to purchase, on remand, the circuit court will have to address these issues. B. Dead Man’s Statute ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18159 - 2005-05-16
to purchase, on remand, the circuit court will have to address these issues. B. Dead Man’s Statute ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18159 - 2005-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144685 - 2015-07-22
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144685 - 2015-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(b). He complains that the trial court: (1) improperly excluded a blood-alcohol chart prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70315 - 2011-08-29
. § 346.63(1)(b). He complains that the trial court: (1) improperly excluded a blood-alcohol chart prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70315 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70621 - 2011-09-07
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70621 - 2011-09-07
State v. William E. Hall
and therefore not valid for purposes of sentence enhancement under § 346.65(2)(b). He contends that his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
and therefore not valid for purposes of sentence enhancement under § 346.65(2)(b). He contends that his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2627 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
:1.5(b)(1) (failing to adequately explain the basis on which lawyer's fee would be calculated); SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115025 - 2014-06-18
:1.5(b)(1) (failing to adequately explain the basis on which lawyer's fee would be calculated); SCR 20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115025 - 2014-06-18
State v. Debra Kerkman
of a child contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), Stats., and one count of intimidation of a victim contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
of a child contrary to § 948.03(2)(b) and (5), Stats., and one count of intimidation of a victim contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
/b/a Allied Insurance, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
/b/a Allied Insurance, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93365 - 2013-02-25
Michelle Harley v. Christine Smith Jackson
of a circuit judge. See Wis. Stat. § 799.207(2)(b) (“Either party may file a demand for trial within 10 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6068 - 2008-01-14
of a circuit judge. See Wis. Stat. § 799.207(2)(b) (“Either party may file a demand for trial within 10 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6068 - 2008-01-14