Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 30115 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts alleged would establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93172 - 2013-02-20
hearing under the de novo standard, independently determining whether the facts alleged would establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93172 - 2013-02-20
State v. Montrell D. McDade
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 McDade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2009-12-17
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 McDade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2009-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Donald P. Sullivan
that the sentencing court considered improper factors under a de novo standard. He seems to further suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
that the sentencing court considered improper factors under a de novo standard. He seems to further suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
[PDF]
Darryl Kusz v. The Home Insurance Company
standard of review is de novo. See Scheunemann v. City of West Bend, 179 Wis.2d 469, 475, 507 N.W.2d 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12985 - 2017-09-21
standard of review is de novo. See Scheunemann v. City of West Bend, 179 Wis.2d 469, 475, 507 N.W.2d 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12985 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vonnie D. Darby
and 973.12, STATS., to an undisputed set of facts. We review this issue de novo. See State v. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12767 - 2017-09-21
and 973.12, STATS., to an undisputed set of facts. We review this issue de novo. See State v. Zimmerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12767 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank Machado
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo." Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo." Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8993 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomson Realty of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Gerald J. Joyce
was properly denied to Joyce. On appeal, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8953 - 2017-09-19
was properly denied to Joyce. On appeal, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8953 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9930 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9930 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Calhoun
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19