Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 68360 for did.
Search results 13161 - 13170 of 68360 for did.
State v. Gregory L. Shade
if the defendant himself or herself did not inform counsel of the existence of such witnesses. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4684 - 2005-03-31
if the defendant himself or herself did not inform counsel of the existence of such witnesses. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
Anna S. v. Diana M.
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale E. Hertzfeld
represented to social services that she did not know where the girls’ fathers were, although Jocelyn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2362 - 2017-09-19
represented to social services that she did not know where the girls’ fathers were, although Jocelyn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2362 - 2017-09-19
State v. James P. Henderson
assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not object to the trial court’s self-defense instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not object to the trial court’s self-defense instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
State v. George F. Passarelli
on his own behalf.[1] He testified that he did not have a fight with D.J. on the dates in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13819 - 2005-03-31
on his own behalf.[1] He testified that he did not have a fight with D.J. on the dates in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
Mary was unloading groceries in the kitchen. Although Bustamante did not testify at trial, he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
Mary was unloading groceries in the kitchen. Although Bustamante did not testify at trial, he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
(customers) did not "prevail" under Wis. Stat. § 425.308 and were thus not entitled to their attorney fees.[1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17229 - 2005-03-31
(customers) did not "prevail" under Wis. Stat. § 425.308 and were thus not entitled to their attorney fees.[1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17229 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
because the police officers “did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and detain” him. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102852 - 2013-10-14
because the police officers “did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and detain” him. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102852 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial before Judge Sumi constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78861 - 2014-09-15
. The trial before Judge Sumi constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78861 - 2014-09-15