Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13171 - 13180 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 13171 - 13180 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
Parkview of Caledonia, LLC v. Joseph Weisto
, within the twenty-one-day time limit claiming damages exceeding Weisto’s $250 security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6076 - 2017-09-19
, within the twenty-one-day time limit claiming damages exceeding Weisto’s $250 security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William Fifer, Sr. v. Lyle A. Dix
. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed Fifer’s negligence claim but that it erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15704 - 2017-09-21
. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed Fifer’s negligence claim but that it erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15704 - 2017-09-21
Stan Smith, Inc. v. Robert Fransway
yards of additional fill Smith claimed to have moved during the final stages of the project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10435 - 2005-03-31
yards of additional fill Smith claimed to have moved during the final stages of the project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10435 - 2005-03-31
William Fifer, Sr. v. Lyle A. Dix
evidence of Dix’s negligence. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed Fifer’s negligence claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15704 - 2005-03-31
evidence of Dix’s negligence. We conclude that the trial court properly dismissed Fifer’s negligence claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
action failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because Stitgen (1) failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39342 - 2014-09-15
action failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because Stitgen (1) failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pecinovsky’s claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and unjust enrichment. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
Pecinovsky’s claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and unjust enrichment. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Stitgen’s complaint against them in the present action failed to state a claim upon which relief can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39342 - 2009-08-12
that Stitgen’s complaint against them in the present action failed to state a claim upon which relief can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39342 - 2009-08-12
State v. Floyd Carter
motion. Carter claims that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request for a different lawyer; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31
motion. Carter claims that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request for a different lawyer; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenges to his restitution obligation. The circuit court denied the claims, and Cheese did not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
challenges to his restitution obligation. The circuit court denied the claims, and Cheese did not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
to dismiss the State’s complaint based on statute of limitations and prosecutorial delay claims. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15
to dismiss the State’s complaint based on statute of limitations and prosecutorial delay claims. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29108 - 2014-09-15