Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Jordan
on accurate information is a constitutional issue presenting a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21549 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey Townsend
Department was advised that Townsend was in custody in Des Plaines, Illinois. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6169 - 2005-03-31

Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
. Whether undisputed facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31

James F. Karls v. David P. Geraghty
. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12666 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the question de novo. See Weinberger v. Bowen, 2000 WI App 264, ¶7, 240 Wis. 2d 55, 622 N.W.2d 471. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95080 - 2013-04-08

Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
the evidence at trial. We decline to depart from this rule to decide de novo whether the parties’ contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id. ¶7 In support of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88301 - 2012-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement for performing a protective search is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 23, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
133, 738 N.W. 2d 81. We review a trial court’s conclusion of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56876 - 2010-11-22

State v. David M. Beasley
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8155 - 2005-03-31