Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 68502 for did.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
attorney was ineffective; that he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently plead guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38398 - 2014-09-15
attorney was ineffective; that he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently plead guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38398 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
[PDF]
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
for maintenance. We disagree. The trial court in the original divorce proceeding did not assign value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7565 - 2017-09-19
for maintenance. We disagree. The trial court in the original divorce proceeding did not assign value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
her and hurt her family if she did not move back to Wisconsin, where he lived, from Hawaii, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573856 - 2022-10-05
her and hurt her family if she did not move back to Wisconsin, where he lived, from Hawaii, where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573856 - 2022-10-05
[PDF]
Anna S. v. Diana M.
Diana did not ask the court to impose these requirements. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5729 - 2017-09-19
Diana did not ask the court to impose these requirements. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5729 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 39
to the trial court that would be deciding Hines’s reconfinement sentence, and include: 1. [Hines] did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28186 - 2014-09-15
to the trial court that would be deciding Hines’s reconfinement sentence, and include: 1. [Hines] did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28186 - 2014-09-15
Anna S. v. Diana M.
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by coming to A.L.’s home, despite the DMCPS requirement that he not do so. DMCPS did not deem placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163156 - 2017-09-21
by coming to A.L.’s home, despite the DMCPS requirement that he not do so. DMCPS did not deem placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence and that trial counsel did not perform deficiently. We affirm. ¶2 H.A. reported that in 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
evidence and that trial counsel did not perform deficiently. We affirm. ¶2 H.A. reported that in 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rock County v. Virgil D.
.” Virgil did not testify or present any witnesses or other evidence. ¶5 The jury, after deliberating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21
.” Virgil did not testify or present any witnesses or other evidence. ¶5 The jury, after deliberating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21208 - 2017-09-21