Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
informed him that his claims were meritless and because he lacked the mental capacity to assist in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345588 - 2021-03-16
informed him that his claims were meritless and because he lacked the mental capacity to assist in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345588 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (defendant barred from raising in postconviction motion claims that could have been raised in prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27313 - 2014-09-15
) (defendant barred from raising in postconviction motion claims that could have been raised in prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that this argument must be raised as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
that this argument must be raised as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because his trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38005 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
involving the same victim. The circuit court rejected his claims. He appeals, pursuing his allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
involving the same victim. The circuit court rejected his claims. He appeals, pursuing his allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
William Becker v. John C. Tritschler
and Lisa Becker were entitled to judgment in the amount of $20,538.86. The Tritschlers claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9681 - 2005-03-31
and Lisa Becker were entitled to judgment in the amount of $20,538.86. The Tritschlers claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prosecution claim against his former wife, Lori Fleming. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110814 - 2017-09-21
prosecution claim against his former wife, Lori Fleming. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110814 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Green, appeals a default judgment entered against her in a small claims action.[2] She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49014 - 2010-04-19
Green, appeals a default judgment entered against her in a small claims action.[2] She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49014 - 2010-04-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on the nature of the claims that Burns asserted, the postconviction court treated the filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540194 - 2022-07-06
. Based on the nature of the claims that Burns asserted, the postconviction court treated the filing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540194 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court concluded that Gils’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173041 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court concluded that Gils’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173041 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
) (defendant barred from raising in postconviction motion claims that could have been raised in prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27313 - 2006-12-04
) (defendant barred from raising in postconviction motion claims that could have been raised in prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27313 - 2006-12-04