Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 83454 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey J. Muschinske
of a controlled substance. The subsequent search of the truck disclosed a small mirror, a razor blade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15027 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Millers Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert Bresina
and remand the case to the commission if the commission’s order or award depends on any material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3490 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2015AP1277-CR 4 ¶7 “The crucial question is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180949 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey J. Muschinske
for operating under the influence of a controlled substance. The subsequent search of the truck disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15027 - 2005-03-31

Millers Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert Bresina
). “The court may, however, set aside the commission’s order or award and remand the case to the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3490 - 2005-03-31

County of Manitowoc v. Jean R. Klug
to suppress and contends that Horneck violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7550 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
), a case decided after Gonzalez’s arrest. Because Brunning acted in objectively reasonable reliance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143918 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Spencer McClain v. Marianne A. Cooke
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2403 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
possession count. The State, however, argued that Maclin was not prejudiced as he was aware since the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
directly from child support is the “substantial expenses and the history of this case.” At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32220 - 2008-03-25