Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 58507 for speedy trial.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 58507 for speedy trial.
State of Arizona v. Brian L. Nowak
proceeding.[1] Nowak raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
proceeding.[1] Nowak raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court had exclusive jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
State v. David G. Alexander
, see §§ 340.01(46m)(b), 346.63(1)(b) & 346.65(2), Stats. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
, see §§ 340.01(46m)(b), 346.63(1)(b) & 346.65(2), Stats. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5455 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5455 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
. No. 95-2752-FT -2- County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.2 Johns contends the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9776 - 2017-09-19
. No. 95-2752-FT -2- County treasurer, and Kenneth Clark.2 Johns contends the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9776 - 2017-09-19
Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
into probate was invalidly executed and the trial court erroneously invalidated the quitclaim deed. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31
into probate was invalidly executed and the trial court erroneously invalidated the quitclaim deed. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl F. Hickman
in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Carl F. Hickman
was ineffective in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
was ineffective in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5454 - 2005-03-31