Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally ineffective and reject as untimely his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83649 - 2014-09-15
that his trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally ineffective and reject as untimely his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83649 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
occurred. At trial, expert testimony was presented indicating that Caitlyn’s conduct was consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
occurred. At trial, expert testimony was presented indicating that Caitlyn’s conduct was consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50853 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
his motion for a new trial.1 Holl contends that: (1) the prosecutor’s “condescending” question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865606 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
BRASH, J. 1 S.M.T. appeals the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights of S.A.D.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233694 - 2019-01-29
BRASH, J. 1 S.M.T. appeals the trial court’s orders terminating her parental rights of S.A.D.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233694 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Jens W.L. Hinrichsen
) there was no probable cause to arrest; (2) the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence; (3) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11375 - 2017-09-19
) there was no probable cause to arrest; (2) the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence; (3) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11375 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
an order denying her postconviction motion for sentence modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald J. Parker v. Rod Buck
from Buck’s sale of a used car to the Parkers. The trial court concluded that Buck misrepresented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25282 - 2017-09-21
from Buck’s sale of a used car to the Parkers. The trial court concluded that Buck misrepresented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
modification. Johnson alleges that the trial court: (1) erred when it denied her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31
not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously admitted “other acts” evidence; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3763 - 2005-03-31