Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13181 - 13190 of 58546 for speedy trial.

[PDF] John E. Joyce v. Anne E. Whiteagle
rights; (3) the $10,000 sanction was not warranted by the evidence; and (4) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9212 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael K. Bloch
under the influence of an intoxicant. See § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He now challenges the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10615 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael K. Bloch
of an intoxicant. See § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He now challenges the trial court's decision, made before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10615 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kurt A. Flisram
, the record shows that Flisram entered an intelligent and voluntary no contest plea. Trial courts should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12343 - 2017-09-21

Herbert Stoeger v. Burnham Broadcasting Company
. The trial court granted Burnham Broadcasting Company and the other respondents judgment after neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7818 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Herbert Stoeger v. Burnham Broadcasting Company
. The trial court granted Burnham Broadcasting Company and the other respondents judgment after neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7818 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert H. Holmes v. Roffers Construction Company, Inc.
. 1 Judge Eaton recused himself after the trial but before judgment was entered. The order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10160 - 2017-09-19

Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
into probate was invalidly executed and the trial court erroneously invalidated the quitclaim deed. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl F. Hickman
was ineffective in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. We disagree that his trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83649 - 2012-07-01