Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13191 - 13200 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13191 - 13200 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Michael H.
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107884 - 2017-09-21
, which is subject to de novo review. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107884 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106035 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848 (1990). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Calhoun
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19
Taxman Investment Company v. Andrew J. Shaw
, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980), and need not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13591 - 2005-03-31
, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980), and need not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13591 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel L. Raisbeck
by all the parties. Id. We review whether a new factor has been shown de novo. State v. Toliver, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8379 - 2005-03-31
by all the parties. Id. We review whether a new factor has been shown de novo. State v. Toliver, 187
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8379 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brent L. Miller
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15991 - 2005-03-31
the arresting officer could have obtained a breath test instead. We decide the issue de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
to perform an investigative stop presents a question of constitutional fact, subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103423 - 2013-10-29
2008 WI APP 169
and rules. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 722, 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34394 - 2008-11-11
and rules. Thus, our review is de novo. See State v. Turnpaugh, 2007 WI App 222, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 722, 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34394 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124263 - 2014-10-15
as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124263 - 2014-10-15