Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13191 - 13200 of 73032 for we.

[PDF] Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
and good-faith duties when it did not pay promptly replacement costs after a fire damaged her house. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21

Dane County v. Gregory R.
was ineffective because he waived one of the four peremptory strikes to which Gregory was entitled. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14065 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel Rodriguez
into the home was unreasonable per se, we reverse the judgment and remand with directions to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3047 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 235
suspicion to temporarily detain him and his two companions. Patton renews this argument on appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26898 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
conviction; and (3) denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We reject his arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concluded that Edwards failed to corroborate the recantation. Upon review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation rather than arguing for a lesser sentence. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lowe was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. La Rae J. Schell
the authority to preclude Schell’s placement on home monitoring, we reverse that part of the amended judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5287 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) failed to establish that he is dangerous pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a), (am). We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375235 - 2021-06-09

[PDF] Steve Berington v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co.
causal negligence. We conclude that the doctrine of claim preclusion bars Mathison's right to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10045 - 2017-09-19