Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 83344 for case search.

[PDF] State v. Darryl Joe Brown
impounding his apartment was unlawful, thus rendering his roommate’s consent to search the apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4666 - 2017-09-19

State v. Darryl Joe Brown
to search the apartment involuntary. In order to lawfully impound the apartment, the police needed probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4666 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 109
omitted)). ¶11 In a case dating from the Prohibition Era, the description of the place to be searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32971 - 2014-09-15

WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1910-CR Complete Title...
of the search, the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule precludes suppression of evidence. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110749 - 2014-05-27

[PDF] WI APP 58
device. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 At issue in this case is whether, despite the illegality of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110749 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wallace Vincent McClain
for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car, forcibly opened a locked console
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12745 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Wallace Vincent McClain
vehicle was stopped for committing a lane deviation violation, police officers searched the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12745 - 2017-09-21

WI App 152 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2553-CR Complete Titl...
to obtain a search warrant, controls the instant case. ¶17 In Romero, a confidential informant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72012 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI App 152
that Romero should not control because it was a No. 2010AP2553-CR 10 search warrant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72012 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was illegally seized when he consented to a search of his vehicle; and (2) even if Hogan was not seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112449 - 2014-05-14