Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 29962 for de.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 29962 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
[PDF]
Harold Carlson Trust v. St. Croix County
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2539 - 2017-09-19
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2539 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-1001 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231724 - 2019-01-09
-1001 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State St
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231724 - 2019-01-09
[PDF]
City of Fort Atkinson v. Ronald A. Lendabarker
, because § 814.14(4)3 provided the party with the option of a de novo trial in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10501 - 2017-09-20
, because § 814.14(4)3 provided the party with the option of a de novo trial in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10501 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Under either a de novo or clearly erroneous standard of review, there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253354 - 2020-02-05
. Under either a de novo or clearly erroneous standard of review, there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253354 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
barred presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
barred presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016666 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
Rules petition 09-08
protects only political or ideological activities.) with Romero v. Collegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico
/supreme/docs/0908petition.pdf - 2009-08-25
protects only political or ideological activities.) with Romero v. Collegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico
/supreme/docs/0908petition.pdf - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
that we should review the trial court de novo and bar the release of those documents, because the damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14572 - 2005-03-31
that we should review the trial court de novo and bar the release of those documents, because the damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Montel Horton v. Gary Mccaughtry
review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667, 431 N.W.2d 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8123 - 2017-09-19
review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667, 431 N.W.2d 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8123 - 2017-09-19