Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 29827 for des.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 29827 for des.
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
review de novo. See Greenwald Fam. Ltd. P’ship v. Village of Mukwonago, 2023 WI 53, ¶13, 408 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801284 - 2024-05-15
CA Blank Order
the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97947 - 2013-06-05
the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Pinter v. American Family Mut. Ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97947 - 2013-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not “reflect any discernible exercise of discretion,” we will apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112697 - 2017-09-21
not “reflect any discernible exercise of discretion,” we will apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112697 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
of his injury. No. 01-2473 4 ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
of his injury. No. 01-2473 4 ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4379 - 2017-09-19
State v. Antonio L. Ford
should therefore review the motion de novo. We do so, but not because of this argument. De novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
should therefore review the motion de novo. We do so, but not because of this argument. De novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36192 - 2014-09-15
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36192 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modified sentence lies within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
review de novo. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modified sentence lies within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21