Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 69131 for he.
Search results 1321 - 1330 of 69131 for he.
Harry T. Staver v. Milwaukee County
because it did not contain record references or citations to legal authority; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
because it did not contain record references or citations to legal authority; (2) he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21220 - 2006-03-22
State v. Derrick D. Johannes
of causing bodily harm by negligent operation of a motor vehicle violating ยงยง 346.62(3) and 346.65(3). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14346 - 2005-03-31
of causing bodily harm by negligent operation of a motor vehicle violating ยงยง 346.62(3) and 346.65(3). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 72
committing the offense until he No. 2007AP778-CR 2 took the witness stand when, in fact, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32503 - 2014-09-15
committing the offense until he No. 2007AP778-CR 2 took the witness stand when, in fact, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), fifth or greater offense.2 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), fifth or greater offense.2 He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72447 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated (OWI), fifth or greater offense.[2] He also challenged an order entered in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
intoxicated (OWI), fifth or greater offense.[2] He also challenged an order entered in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72447 - 2011-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction arguing that he is entitled to a new trial for one or all of the following reasons: because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32247 - 2008-04-01
conviction arguing that he is entitled to a new trial for one or all of the following reasons: because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32247 - 2008-04-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals his conviction arguing that he is entitled to a new trial for one or all of the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32247 - 2014-09-15
appeals his conviction arguing that he is entitled to a new trial for one or all of the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32247 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled no contest to a charge of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled no contest to a charge of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel. Metzner also argues that he was improperly convicted and sentenced on felony bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356007 - 2021-04-14
assistance of counsel. Metzner also argues that he was improperly convicted and sentenced on felony bail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356007 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Turner argues he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court improperly admitted impeachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25
Turner argues he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court improperly admitted impeachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25