Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Rickey Eugene Pinkard
of § 961.41(1m) to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19522 - 2017-09-21
of § 961.41(1m) to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel P.
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP546 2 ¶1 BROWN, J. 1 Mitchel P. contests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2005AP546 2 ¶1 BROWN, J. 1 Mitchel P. contests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87247 - 2014-09-15
the right to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87247 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo whether the State’s conduct is a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541748 - 2022-07-08
de novo whether the State’s conduct is a substantial and material breach of the plea agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541748 - 2022-07-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
Whether Powell’s motion was procedurally barred by Escalona is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41868 - 2014-09-15
Whether Powell’s motion was procedurally barred by Escalona is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41868 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald R. MacClymont v. Harriet J. Gilligan
by the trial court satisfy the legal standard for unjust enrichment is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
by the trial court satisfy the legal standard for unjust enrichment is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8768 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Barb Bocik Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
. John A. Des Jardins Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Barb Bocik Clerk of Circuit Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497277 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater
(20) and 893.80, STATS. The construction of a statute presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11012 - 2017-09-19
(20) and 893.80, STATS. The construction of a statute presents a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11012 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward Leon Jackson
has a double jeopardy claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Kohler, 248 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6731 - 2017-09-20
has a double jeopardy claim is a question of law that we review de novo. Kohler, 248 Wis. 2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6731 - 2017-09-20