Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 68347 for did.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 68347 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
constituted de novo review of a prior municipal court decision. Buhler did not appeal the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78861 - 2012-02-29
Anna S. v. Diana M.
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
)[1] related to Anna’s ability to relocate with Keisha because Diana did not ask the court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5729 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dale E. Hertzfeld
represented to social services that she did not know where the girls’ fathers were, although Jocelyn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2362 - 2017-09-19
represented to social services that she did not know where the girls’ fathers were, although Jocelyn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2362 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
American to pay for their defense, and stated that if the Gibneys did not contact them by March 6, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28430 - 2007-03-13
American to pay for their defense, and stated that if the Gibneys did not contact them by March 6, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28430 - 2007-03-13
State v. Donavan D. Theno
Although trial counsel did not make a motion to strike the prospective juror for cause, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16026 - 2005-03-31
Although trial counsel did not make a motion to strike the prospective juror for cause, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16026 - 2005-03-31
State v. James P. Henderson
assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not object to the trial court’s self-defense instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not object to the trial court’s self-defense instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
State v. George F. Passarelli
on his own behalf.[1] He testified that he did not have a fight with D.J. on the dates in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13819 - 2005-03-31
on his own behalf.[1] He testified that he did not have a fight with D.J. on the dates in question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sebastian Frank Bustamante
Mary was unloading groceries in the kitchen. Although Bustamante did not testify at trial, he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
Mary was unloading groceries in the kitchen. Although Bustamante did not testify at trial, he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9616 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
-examination: Q: And you didn’t look in the storage tanks of any of the other raw ingredients, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36537 - 2014-09-15
-examination: Q: And you didn’t look in the storage tanks of any of the other raw ingredients, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36537 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
because the police officers “did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and detain” him. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102852 - 2013-10-14
because the police officers “did not have reasonable suspicion to stop and detain” him. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102852 - 2013-10-14