Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13201 - 13210 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Sean R. Haverty
that revoked his operating privileges for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
that revoked his operating privileges for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sean R. Haverty
for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty claims that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21286 - 2006-02-07
for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty claims that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21286 - 2006-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for refusing a test: a 20022 revocation in Illinois and a 2003 revocation in Wisconsin. In 2020, Hess moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531557 - 2022-06-15
for refusing a test: a 20022 revocation in Illinois and a 2003 revocation in Wisconsin. In 2020, Hess moved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531557 - 2022-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sobriety tests. Based on those tests, Thorpe concluded that Leitzke was impaired. After administering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866326 - 2024-10-24
sobriety tests. Based on those tests, Thorpe concluded that Leitzke was impaired. After administering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866326 - 2024-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sobriety tests. Based on those tests, Thorpe concluded that Leitzke was impaired. After administering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866326 - 2024-10-24
sobriety tests. Based on those tests, Thorpe concluded that Leitzke was impaired. After administering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866326 - 2024-10-24
State v. Jon G. Rose
On October 16, 2000, an officer arrested Rose for OMVWI after Rose failed two field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5035 - 2005-03-31
On October 16, 2000, an officer arrested Rose for OMVWI after Rose failed two field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jon G. Rose
tests and refused to submit to other field tests, proclaiming, “I’m drunk and you’re going to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5035 - 2017-09-19
tests and refused to submit to other field tests, proclaiming, “I’m drunk and you’re going to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5035 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Haydock
finding that his refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test was unreasonable. As a result, Haydock’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11664 - 2017-09-19
finding that his refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test was unreasonable. As a result, Haydock’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11664 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) reading and that, because the deputy lacked the threshold facts that must exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10
Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) reading and that, because the deputy lacked the threshold facts that must exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10
State v. Andrew D. Birmingham
to submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT). We affirm because under the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28
to submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT). We affirm because under the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18733 - 2005-06-28