Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13211 - 13220 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 13211 - 13220 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 961.41(3g)(c). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress the cocaine.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28229 - 2014-09-15
. § 961.41(3g)(c). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress the cocaine.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick W. Kenney
of “attempting to attempt” a crime, which does not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
of “attempting to attempt” a crime, which does not exist under Wisconsin law; (4) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3763 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carl F. Hickman
was ineffective in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
was ineffective in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carl F. Hickman
in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
in several regards. We affirm based on the trial court’s assessment that Hickman’s assertions about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, the judgment shall be modified to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
, the judgment shall be modified to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See State v. Prihoda, 2000 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147266 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
Beth E. Hammond v. Dennis W. Hammond
, maintenance of $778 per month. Mr. Hammond argues: (1) that the evidence does not support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14665 - 2017-09-21
, maintenance of $778 per month. Mr. Hammond argues: (1) that the evidence does not support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and alternatively argues he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Whyte’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141618 - 2017-09-21
and alternatively argues he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice. We reject Whyte’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stephen E. Lee
. Affirmed. ANDERSON, J. Stephen E. Lee contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14485 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. ANDERSON, J. Stephen E. Lee contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were scheduled for trial on June 13, 2016. On that date, he appeared with trial counsel and told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250788 - 2019-11-26
were scheduled for trial on June 13, 2016. On that date, he appeared with trial counsel and told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250788 - 2019-11-26
State v. Rovaughn Hill
and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. Rovaughn Hill appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31
and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 VERGERONT, J. Rovaughn Hill appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31