Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13221 - 13230 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13221 - 13230 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
that it was subject to division under WIS. STAT. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.4 Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4220 - 2017-09-19
that it was subject to division under WIS. STAT. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.4 Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 806.07. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35260 - 2014-09-15
. § 806.07. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35260 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 71
decision and apply de novo review.2 DISCUSSION ¶7 The legislature has delegated to DHS the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82279 - 2014-09-15
decision and apply de novo review.2 DISCUSSION ¶7 The legislature has delegated to DHS the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Raisbeck
shown de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 362, 523 N.W.2d 113, 119 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8379 - 2017-09-19
shown de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 362, 523 N.W.2d 113, 119 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8379 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lisa R. Steeno v. Joseph L. Steeno
and the construction of a written contract is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6750 - 2017-09-20
and the construction of a written contract is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6750 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
N.W.2d 366 (Ct. App. 1988). Nor has de Barros shown the DNR intentionally provided the wrong permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50672 - 2014-09-15
N.W.2d 366 (Ct. App. 1988). Nor has de Barros shown the DNR intentionally provided the wrong permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50672 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103595 - 2017-09-21
review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should be modified is a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard the circuit court employs. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84063 - 2014-09-15
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard the circuit court employs. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Darby, 2009 WI App 50, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 478, 766 N.W.2d 770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115773 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Darby, 2009 WI App 50, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 478, 766 N.W.2d 770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21