Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13231 - 13240 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 13231 - 13240 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, and he argued that Reiman’s claims failed in their entirety because Reiman could not prove two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878298 - 2024-11-19
judgment, and he argued that Reiman’s claims failed in their entirety because Reiman could not prove two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878298 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case pending his pursuit of a worker’s compensation claim.1 We reverse the order and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142339 - 2017-09-21
case pending his pursuit of a worker’s compensation claim.1 We reverse the order and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. United America argues the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. United America argues the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738189 - 2023-12-13
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that her action was barred under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12682 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Dietzen v. Diane Hardt
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2008-05-14
a notice of claim with the attorney general, as required by § 893.82(3), Stats.[1] The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8124 - 2008-05-14
Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
and Mary Schaefer (the Schaefers) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31
and Mary Schaefer (the Schaefers) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
of claim preclusion, and in concluding that her action was frivolous. We conclude that Antczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas raised an additional issue, claiming Bryant-Nanz was ineffective for failing to file a Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
Thomas raised an additional issue, claiming Bryant-Nanz was ineffective for failing to file a Miranda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147020 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 A no-merit appeal was filed and rejected. On direct appeal, Lewis raised eight claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56775 - 2010-11-15
. ¶3 A no-merit appeal was filed and rejected. On direct appeal, Lewis raised eight claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56775 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
of three of the appellant’s claims. Here the circuit court dismissed all but one cause of action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11
of three of the appellant’s claims. Here the circuit court dismissed all but one cause of action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28675 - 2007-07-11