Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 69114 for he.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10142 - 2017-09-19
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10142 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He challenges the circuit court’s sentence on due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435201 - 2021-10-06
and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He challenges the circuit court’s sentence on due
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435201 - 2021-10-06
State v. Edward C. Brandau
, criminal trespass, and two counts of theft. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
, criminal trespass, and two counts of theft. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10139 - 2005-03-31
State v. John C. VanNorman
an unconscious person. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for an in-camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13701 - 2005-03-31
an unconscious person. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for an in-camera inspection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert T. Langston
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
with the State in which he waived his right to a preliminary hearing in return for the State’s promise to charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
State v. John S. Spicer
without consent, and escape, all as a habitual criminal except the escape conviction. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
without consent, and escape, all as a habitual criminal except the escape conviction. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21627 - 2006-03-01
State v. Brian R. Nacker
form, and asked him to submit to an intoxilyzer test. He said "yes." A few minutes later he said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9181 - 2005-05-16
form, and asked him to submit to an intoxilyzer test. He said "yes." A few minutes later he said he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9181 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward C. Brandau
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10143 - 2017-09-19
. He also appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery Nos. 95-3528-CR 95-3529-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10143 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in those previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29
claimed he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in those previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100149 - 2013-07-29