Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 45847 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13241 - 13250 of 45847 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Mark A. Johnson
revoking his operating privileges because of his refusal to submit to chemical testing after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
revoking his operating privileges because of his refusal to submit to chemical testing after his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
to detain him for the purpose of conducting field sobriety tests, nor did the officer have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
to detain him for the purpose of conducting field sobriety tests, nor did the officer have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
to detain him for the purpose of conducting field sobriety tests, nor did the officer have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31
to detain him for the purpose of conducting field sobriety tests, nor did the officer have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6084 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A. Salm
refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Salm argues that because she was never placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Salm argues that because she was never placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karen A. Salm
that her refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Salm argues that because she was never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4373 - 2017-09-19
that her refusal to submit to chemical testing was unreasonable. Salm argues that because she was never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4373 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael P. Schoenberg
to say that because the State had submitted evidence of a test which was over the limit, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15610 - 2005-03-31
to say that because the State had submitted evidence of a test which was over the limit, the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” that he was going to “put [Gill] through field [sobriety testing],” and that he was going to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642006 - 2023-04-06
,” that he was going to “put [Gill] through field [sobriety testing],” and that he was going to give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642006 - 2023-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
order suppressing evidence obtained from field sobriety tests of Mary Alice Gentry on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82916 - 2012-05-23
order suppressing evidence obtained from field sobriety tests of Mary Alice Gentry on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82916 - 2012-05-23
[PDF]
State v. Jeanne M. Hanson
denying her motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4256 - 2017-09-19
denying her motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4256 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeanne M. Hanson
ruling denying her motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4256 - 2005-03-31
ruling denying her motion to suppress evidence of a blood test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4256 - 2005-03-31