Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13261 - 13270 of 58983 for dos.
Search results 13261 - 13270 of 58983 for dos.
Waukesha County v. Spencer C.N.
judges are to refuse to accept commitment petitions drafted by persons not authorized to do so. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13752 - 2005-03-31
judges are to refuse to accept commitment petitions drafted by persons not authorized to do so. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13752 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy Gordon LeDioyt was doing paperwork when he heard a call from dispatch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2006-12-05
, Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy Gordon LeDioyt was doing paperwork when he heard a call from dispatch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2006-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 A defendant is entitled to withdraw a no-contest plea after sentencing if doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
. ¶5 A defendant is entitled to withdraw a no-contest plea after sentencing if doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98249 - 2013-06-18
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the trial court’s denial of a hearing and do not reach the second question. ¶2 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
affirm the trial court’s denial of a hearing and do not reach the second question. ¶2 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29787 - 2007-07-23
Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
a traffic statute. See id. The circumstances do not have to demonstrate proof beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
a traffic statute. See id. The circumstances do not have to demonstrate proof beyond a reasonable doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Deputy Gordon LeDioyt was doing paperwork when he heard a call from dispatch. Dispatch indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
Deputy Gordon LeDioyt was doing paperwork when he heard a call from dispatch. Dispatch indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
make a difference to any issue raised in this appeal. Therefore, we do not refer to the umbrella
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150827 - 2017-09-21
make a difference to any issue raised in this appeal. Therefore, we do not refer to the umbrella
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150827 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Braxton
repeater. No. 00-2149 4 was based did not. While we do not agree that the four cases upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2900 - 2017-09-19
repeater. No. 00-2149 4 was based did not. While we do not agree that the four cases upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2900 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enticement, count two? THE DEFENDANT: No contest. THE COURT: Why are we doing a no contest plea? I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252958 - 2020-01-24
enticement, count two? THE DEFENDANT: No contest. THE COURT: Why are we doing a no contest plea? I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252958 - 2020-01-24
[PDF]
Sharon Arnsmeier v. Ivan Arnsmeier
that the transaction dates were incorrectly recorded. No. 98-2871 5 that assertion. While the dates do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14588 - 2017-09-21
that the transaction dates were incorrectly recorded. No. 98-2871 5 that assertion. While the dates do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14588 - 2017-09-21