Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13261 - 13270 of 73032 for petition.

Alexander Mayes v. David H. Schwarz
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12335 - 2010-07-13

[PDF] Alexander Mayes v. David H. Schwarz
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12335 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 7
a document which the Seventh Circuit construed as a petition for rehearing. The court denied the petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923746 - 2025-04-11

Frontsheet
of that second commitment period, Wood has filed seven petitions for conditional release, none of which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48193 - 2010-03-18

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Supplemental Appendix of Petitioners
, NATHANIEL SLACK, MARY SMITH-JOHNSON, DENISE (DEE) SWEET, AND GABRIELLE YOUNG, Petitioners, GOVERNOR
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030suppappendixpet.pdf - 2023-10-30

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - January 2021
, and unlawful possession of a firearm. Chambers petitioned the Supreme Court for review. Citing McCoy
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327359 - 2021-01-21

Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
, 1997 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797534 - 2024-05-08

[PDF] Richard D. v. Rebecca G.
of Case: † Petition for Review filed. IN THE INTEREST OF CARYN A.-G., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15142 - 2017-09-21

State v. Danny C. Eesley
-Petitioner. ON REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Reported at: 217 Wis. 2d 291, 577 N.W.2d 387
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31