Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Sol Coleman, Jr. v. Michael Sullivan
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
interpretation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See Spence v. Cooke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14472 - 2005-03-31
William B. Diel v. State of Wisconsin-Labor and Industry Review Commission
the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel contests LIRC’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31
the facts de novo, as Diel would have us do. ¶10 Diel contests LIRC’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2780 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane E. Bolstad
fact, which we review de novo. State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66, 525 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
fact, which we review de novo. State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66, 525 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which relief can be granted presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. DeBruin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
which relief can be granted presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review. DeBruin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dennis J. Flynn v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
. The parties agree that the facts are not in dispute and that we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12733 - 2017-09-21
. The parties agree that the facts are not in dispute and that we review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12733 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
“presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would have been different.” Rockette, 294 Wis. 2d 611, ¶40. We review de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144477 - 2017-09-21
would have been different.” Rockette, 294 Wis. 2d 611, ¶40. We review de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the actual penalty is de minimus. See State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-15
and the actual penalty is de minimus. See State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. Schultz
of the plea agreement is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Ferguson, 166 Wis.2d 317, 320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15013 - 2017-09-21
of the plea agreement is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Ferguson, 166 Wis.2d 317, 320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15013 - 2017-09-21