Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 49831 for our.

[PDF] State v. Edward Lee Hennings
appeal, we affirmed the judgment and the order denying the postconviction motions. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16144 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Linda M. Heath-Miller v. Mark A. Miller
was 1 We recognize that our factual recitation is not a complete description of the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5478 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kimberly Sotelo
: "Our holding today does no more than determine the meaning of Chimel's principles in this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9223 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark R. Lowe
without a tax stamp. ¶18 The double jeopardy clauses of our federal and state constitutions protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the No. 2017AP941-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213043 - 2018-05-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
factors warranting relief. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2017AP328
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210927 - 2018-04-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
supports our conclusion that C.S.S.’s plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, we reject her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209373 - 2018-03-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
stop was extended beyond its initial scope. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859491 - 2024-10-10

[PDF] State v. Tremaine Y.
, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7614 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
—are irrelevant based on our conclusion regarding the issue of burden of proof. See Maryland Arms Ltd. P’ship v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23