Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Daniel R. French
court’s determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test; he does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
court’s determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test; he does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
the trial court’s conclusion that Eccles’s refusal to provide a sample of his breath for chemical testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2010-07-01
the trial court’s conclusion that Eccles’s refusal to provide a sample of his breath for chemical testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2010-07-01
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
State v. Adam V. Tovsen
suspicion to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
suspicion to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment convicting him of refusal to take a chemical breath test after an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment convicting him of refusal to take a chemical breath test after an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19
State v. Stephen Pritchard
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31