Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 58511 for speedy trial.
Search results 13271 - 13280 of 58511 for speedy trial.
State v. Mary Lou McClain
. § 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c) (1999-2000)[1] and the trial court’s order denying her motion to withdraw her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
. § 943.20(1)(b) and (3)(c) (1999-2000)[1] and the trial court’s order denying her motion to withdraw her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process; that sufficient evidence supported the jury verdict; and that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273166 - 2020-07-29
process; that sufficient evidence supported the jury verdict; and that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273166 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Edron D. Broomfield
a juror, who prior to trial had overheard information regarding his past alleged misconduct, was biased
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17215 - 2017-09-21
a juror, who prior to trial had overheard information regarding his past alleged misconduct, was biased
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17215 - 2017-09-21
State v. Damian Darnell Washington
denying his postconviction motion, which sought reconsideration of the trial court’s denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18174 - 2005-07-06
denying his postconviction motion, which sought reconsideration of the trial court’s denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18174 - 2005-07-06
2009 WI APP 42
contends that the circuit court erred in: (1) permitting Koslow to provide testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35927 - 2009-05-11
contends that the circuit court erred in: (1) permitting Koslow to provide testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35927 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the trial court’s determination that he was unfit. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130940 - 2017-09-21
that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support the trial court’s determination that he was unfit. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130940 - 2017-09-21
Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
motion to strike and for default judgment. The trial court denied the motion for sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31
motion to strike and for default judgment. The trial court denied the motion for sanctions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5016 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark Regal v. General Motors Corporation
24, 2001, Regal withdrew his motion to strike and for default judgment. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5016 - 2017-09-19
24, 2001, Regal withdrew his motion to strike and for default judgment. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5016 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-day bench trial, which commenced on November 2, 2000. Neal was represented by defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163313 - 2017-09-21
-day bench trial, which commenced on November 2, 2000. Neal was represented by defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163313 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231200 - 2018-12-26
allegations to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231200 - 2018-12-26