Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13281 - 13290 of 68347 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
, particularly during closing argument. Deal argues that he was prejudiced because the jury did not hear how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71073 - 2011-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
” obligation encompassed things that the responsible agency did after the date the petition was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83529 - 2012-06-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with paranoid schizophrenia, missed required contacts with the County, was late to appointments, and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240516 - 2019-05-14

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
.” (Emphasis added.) Rieder did not have a separate agreement with the County at the time of his retirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143706 - 2015-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel did not object: [State]: You indicated that you weren’t familiar with the gunshot residue test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13

[PDF] Robert Meixelsperger v. Debbra L. Meixelsperger
, or to amortize that amount in monthly installments, over seven years at eight percent interest. The court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12816 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Albarado then did so. ¶7 Approximately one week later, on October 2, 2014, Hunt sent an email
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226969 - 2018-11-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Gray stated to me that, “He didn’t know anything about the incident, but that he did overhear people
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701595 - 2023-09-12

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 12 (1986). The defendant has the burden of making a prima facie showing that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03

Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
of one’s income that can be garnished, 15 U.S.C. § 1673, did not apply in this case. We conclude the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31