Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13281 - 13290 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 13281 - 13290 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. Gaillard filed a postconviction motion seeking resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792620 - 2024-04-30
years of extended supervision. Gaillard filed a postconviction motion seeking resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792620 - 2024-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. Since his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97896 - 2013-07-16
years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgment of conviction. Since his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97896 - 2013-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ extended supervision. No. 2018AP645 3 Abt appealed and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
years’ extended supervision. No. 2018AP645 3 Abt appealed and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245275 - 2019-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the engine for an extended time with the brake engaged. According to one analyst, “[t]his abnormal operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32088 - 2008-03-12
the engine for an extended time with the brake engaged. According to one analyst, “[t]his abnormal operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32088 - 2008-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision and ordered restitution, the amount
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision and ordered restitution, the amount
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, comprising six years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107851 - 2017-09-21
, comprising six years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107851 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward D. Werchowski
and extended family members. As a mitigating factor, the court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
and extended family members. As a mitigating factor, the court recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a copy of the sealed in camera transcript. We affirm. ¶2 Fortune was released on extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21
with a copy of the sealed in camera transcript. We affirm. ¶2 Fortune was released on extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
totaling fifteen months of initial confinement followed by twenty-four months of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
totaling fifteen months of initial confinement followed by twenty-four months of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780520 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of extended supervision. Wilke appeals. The only issue discussed in the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17
months of extended supervision. Wilke appeals. The only issue discussed in the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751664 - 2024-01-17

