Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13281 - 13290 of 40205 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 13281 - 13290 of 40205 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
WI APP 63
by the admission at trial, through other witnesses, of out-of-court statements by Megan and her younger brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727950 - 2024-01-18
by the admission at trial, through other witnesses, of out-of-court statements by Megan and her younger brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727950 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
treatment progress notes without a valid exception. We conclude that the statements were generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550512 - 2022-08-02
treatment progress notes without a valid exception. We conclude that the statements were generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550512 - 2022-08-02
[PDF]
State v. Brett E. Alford
impeach a witness regarding one of Alford’s inculpatory statements. He also argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11649 - 2017-09-19
impeach a witness regarding one of Alford’s inculpatory statements. He also argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11649 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Samuel D. Clay
examination and the State's use of a co-defendant's out-of-court statements. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9431 - 2017-09-19
examination and the State's use of a co-defendant's out-of-court statements. We reject his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9431 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brett E. Alford
his counsel failed to impeach a witness regarding one of Alford’s inculpatory statements. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
his counsel failed to impeach a witness regarding one of Alford’s inculpatory statements. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11649 - 2005-03-31
State v. Samuel D. Clay
of a co-defendant's out-of-court statements. We reject his arguments on these issues and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
of a co-defendant's out-of-court statements. We reject his arguments on these issues and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
bitch keep calling my phone …. I have to blow Shorty down.” Lisa understood this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
bitch keep calling my phone …. I have to blow Shorty down.” Lisa understood this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
the testimony of Detective Warren Allen about a witness’s statement to police implicating him. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102506 - 2013-09-30
the testimony of Detective Warren Allen about a witness’s statement to police implicating him. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102506 - 2013-09-30
State v. Thomas Dubak
and that the trial court erred by admitting statements he made to officer David Hake. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15105 - 2005-03-31
and that the trial court erred by admitting statements he made to officer David Hake. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antwan I. Slater
. No. 2005AP1804-CR 3 ¶5 Slater seeks the identities of confidential informants whose statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21603 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP1804-CR 3 ¶5 Slater seeks the identities of confidential informants whose statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21603 - 2017-09-21