Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13291 - 13300 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 13291 - 13300 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
TKO, Ltd. v. Wayne Manternach
, Grayfield contends that the summary judgment was in error both as to TKO’s claim and Grayfield’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13166 - 2005-03-31
, Grayfield contends that the summary judgment was in error both as to TKO’s claim and Grayfield’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
DeMarinis Pizza Place, Inc. v. Vincent DeMarinis
in the South Wentworth property, and as a counterclaim, they incorporated by reference the claims presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11165 - 2017-09-19
in the South Wentworth property, and as a counterclaim, they incorporated by reference the claims presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11165 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
TKO, Ltd. v. Wayne Manternach
that the summary judgment was in error both as to TKO’s claim and Grayfield’s counterclaims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13166 - 2017-09-21
that the summary judgment was in error both as to TKO’s claim and Grayfield’s counterclaims. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13166 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. She claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
also appeals from an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. She claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, for malpractice, breach of fiduciary duties, and breach of contract. 1 The claims involved McGinnis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213611 - 2018-05-30
, for malpractice, breach of fiduciary duties, and breach of contract. 1 The claims involved McGinnis’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213611 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Rivera claims that his postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these issues in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541975 - 2022-07-12
, Rivera claims that his postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise these issues in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541975 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his offender classification was affected by the DOC’s error. This claim lacks arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643518 - 2023-04-11
his offender classification was affected by the DOC’s error. This claim lacks arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643518 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
John Trenhaile v. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
for his breach-of-contract claim. Trenhaile was awarded damages for his breach-of-contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5834 - 2017-09-19
for his breach-of-contract claim. Trenhaile was awarded damages for his breach-of-contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5834 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
makes multiple claims of error that he believes warrant reversal of his conviction and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197315 - 2017-10-03
makes multiple claims of error that he believes warrant reversal of his conviction and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197315 - 2017-10-03
John Trenhaile v. J.H. Findorff & Son, Inc.
that he was not entitled to consequential damages for his breach-of-contract claim. Trenhaile was awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31
that he was not entitled to consequential damages for his breach-of-contract claim. Trenhaile was awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5834 - 2005-03-31