Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 16942 for "48.44" +50.

Kenneth Raymond Rykal v. Sandra Kay Rykal
was a “substantial asset” and “a valid consideration by the court for deviation from the 50/50 division.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3837 - 2005-03-31

Spencer McClain v. Jerry Smith, Jr.
of certiorari review, State ex rel. Johnson v. Cady, 50 Wis. 2d 540, 549-50, 185 N.W.2d 306 (1971), and, as we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4058 - 2005-03-31

Debra Sue Farber v. Daniel Paul Farber
was to be increased after the sale of the funeral chapel to include 50% of the funeral chapel’s net sale proceeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16008 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently ordered a 50/50 placement schedule. Responsibility for the payment of variable costs, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66958 - 2011-07-05

Debra J.S. v. Thomas L.
deprivation of due process. The court also assessed $50 costs against the Winnebago County Child Support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11007 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Handyman agreed to split 50-50 the fees generated by Laur’s work under the Agreement. The Agreement also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84917 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
—lock Mr. Locke—up for 50 years, with 30 years of initial confinement and 50 [sic[2]] years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100038 - 2013-07-29

State v. Norbert J. Maday
to impeach witness credibility. McClelland v. State, 84 Wis.2d 145, 158‑59, 267 N.W.2d 843, 849-50 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8774 - 2005-03-31

State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
evidence that a manifest injustice has occurred. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stephen E. Lee
In State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996), the supreme court set out the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5946 - 2005-03-31