Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 45231 for Cost-effective.

Richard Kleinke, Sr. v. Farmers Cooperative Supply & Shipping
) did the trial court err in awarding costs to the plaintiffs for mediation fees; and (3) did the trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17000 - 2005-03-31

Steven D. Pederson v. Town Board of the Town of Windsor
before the board held on Pederson's proposed final CSM, Pederson proposed sharing the cost of improving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8378 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Guideline for drug courts on screening and assessment
that actually enter the program, a separate screening process is a cost-effective way to “screen out
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/guidelinesscreeningassess.pdf - 2021-09-23

COURT OF APPEALS
permits) and similar compliance issues are current and in full force and effect. (Parenthetical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33907 - 2008-09-02

[PDF] NOTICE
compliance issues are current and in full force and effect. (Parenthetical in original.) ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33907 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI 28
direct Attorney Olson to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which are $5886.27, as of January
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28400 - 2007-03-08

[PDF] WI 117
to pay the outstanding costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $2,091.29 as of July 10
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34071 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michele A. Tjader
, and to pay the costs of this proceeding. ¶2 We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 28
the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which are $5886.27, as of January 11, 2007. ¶3 Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28400 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
period of time, that “substantially effects the ability to use the mobile home” unless the mobile home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175684 - 2017-09-21