Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 83278 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the information in a search warrant affidavit is stale “must be determined by the circumstances of each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627534 - 2023-02-28
the information in a search warrant affidavit is stale “must be determined by the circumstances of each case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627534 - 2023-02-28
State v. Keith A. Johnson
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rocky A. Knoble
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14695 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, Knoble and Johnson filed motions to suppress evidence alleging that the searches were performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14695 - 2005-03-31
State v. Justin Kolp
2002 WI App 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Justin Kolp
2002 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to search. Ibid. ¶6 Unlike the situation in Luebeck, the police in this case had not yet completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
to search. Ibid. ¶6 Unlike the situation in Luebeck, the police in this case had not yet completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State v. Stevens
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31