Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 29817 for des.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. (citation omitted). “The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law” we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luis A. Martinez
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott M. Doering
stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19
stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66710 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66710 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32159 - 2008-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997, Tratz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31