Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 29712 for des.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
Montel Horton v. Gary Mccaughtry
review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667, 431 N.W.2d 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8123 - 2017-09-19
review is therefore de novo. Reel Enters. v. City of La Crosse, 146 Wis.2d 662, 667, 431 N.W.2d 743
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8123 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
, Tratz filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
, Tratz filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modified sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49234 - 2014-09-15
” is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modified sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49234 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36192 - 2014-09-15
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36192 - 2014-09-15
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
Joseph Ray Halsted v. Society Insurance Company
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Guenther v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Guenther v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4379 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
action, so we have no way of knowing, on our de novo review, whether the circuit court correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06
action, so we have no way of knowing, on our de novo review, whether the circuit court correctly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of an asset as either divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85990 - 2012-08-14
of an asset as either divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85990 - 2012-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶26, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo “the legal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498657 - 2022-03-29
.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶26, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo “the legal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498657 - 2022-03-29