Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 12860 for se.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 12860 for se.
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998,[3] alleged numerous procedural violations before and during his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998,[3] alleged numerous procedural violations before and during his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
[PDF]
Alternative Dispute Resolution Report, Revised 9-5-2000
to an appellate decision5. In District I, the local staff attorney screens all docketing statements to se- lect
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
to an appellate decision5. In District I, the local staff attorney screens all docketing statements to se- lect
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
State v. Victor E. Holm
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Victor Holm, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20763 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Victor Holm, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Hosp. Ass’n, 78 F.3d 1079, 1088 (6th Cir. 1996). The first analysis applies the “per se” rule, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31865 - 2014-09-15
Hosp. Ass’n, 78 F.3d 1079, 1088 (6th Cir. 1996). The first analysis applies the “per se” rule, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31865 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments of paternity and for a DNA paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6456 - 2017-09-19
, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments of paternity and for a DNA paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6456 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Rodgers’ motion to proceed either with new counsel or pro se, and a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
Rodgers’ motion to proceed either with new counsel or pro se, and a new trial in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the trial court did not err in denying Rodgers’ motion to proceed either with new counsel or pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60436 - 2014-09-15
, the trial court did not err in denying Rodgers’ motion to proceed either with new counsel or pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60436 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
se, appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for leave to file a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58508 - 2014-09-15
se, appeal from an order of the circuit court denying their motion for leave to file a second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58508 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kenneth Mette, pro se, appeals from a judgment dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kenneth Mette, pro se, appeals from a judgment dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65083 - 2011-05-31